You will have time to make the necessary revisions before resubmitting your article if the editor requests it.
Even though it can be difficult, try not to take offense at any criticism of your article that you receive from the reviewers in their comments.
After reading the reviewer report for the first time, some researchers find it useful to set it aside for a few days. You'll find it easier to respond to the reviewer's criticisms with objectivity when you've had some time to process the notion that your work needs more polish.
After reviewing the reviewer report, give the editor's and reviewers' feedback a thorough read, and consider what modifications you should make to your article in response. By considering their suggestions, you may ensure that your finished piece is as strong and influential as possible.
Please make sure that your revisions take into account every reviewer and editor remark.
Resubmitting your article and including a two-column grid detailing your manuscript revisions may be beneficial. List all of the reviewers' remarks on one side of the grid, and then explain the changes you made in response on the other. Using this approach can help you organize your ideas and show the editor and reviewers that you have taken their criticisms into consideration.
It's critical that you don't disregard review comments that you disagree with. Instead, with your resubmission, provide a justification for why you haven't made that change. After that, when the revised article is returned to the reviewers, the editor can evaluate it and incorporate your reasoning.
You have the right to defend your position, but when you do, make sure your argument is made in an assertive, convincing manner rather than a defensive or hostile one.